Chiropractic Responses to
Chirobase and/or Quackwatch
Chiropractic practitioners, students, and employees who would like to post a response to anything on Chirobase are welcome to submit a comment of up to 500 words. General comments will be indexed on this page. Comments about specific articles will probably be linked to the articles themselves. If commenting on a specific article, please indicate which one.
Cheers (6)
- Your work is sorely needed! (David J. Guerriero, DC, 1/26/99)
- Why do chiropractors respond evasively to criticism? (Bryan Capen, 3/5/99)
- It's time to bring our profession into the present (David A. Durkop, DC, 5/16/99)
- You are right on many topics (Larry Shawn Cagle, DC, and Vicky L. Cagle, DC, 9/8/99)
- I am very disappointed in the profession I chose (Bryan Lee, 1/14/06)
- Now I understand why Quackwatch is needed (Brian Wilson, 8/22/07)
Jeers (39)
- I wish you'd get hooked up with a good DC. (Mitch Carter, 11/20/98)
- Chirobase is cynical, misleading, and vindictive (William Lauretti, DC, 12/8/98)
- You should focus on medicine's shortcomings. (Michael J. Dalan, DC, 12/23/98)
- So you think you're GOD? (Michael Page II, DC, 1/9/99)
- Science is not based on YOUR belief systems (Aaron Root, DC, 1/12/99)
- We are too good to worry about your little vendetta (Zachary D. Weiser, DC, 3/10/99)
- Before bashing chiropractic, it would be a good idea to know something about it. (Angela Vitale, 4/29/99)
- I dare you to print this (Patrick J. Ryan, DC, 4/22/99)
- A chiropractor who does not believe in subluxation is not a chiropractor (Bryan C. Osborne, 5/2/99)
- I feel sorry for you! (Stephanie R. Grenier, DC, 7/20-22/99)
- You are out of touch. (Russell Davis, ATC, CSCS, 8/4/99)
- The chiropractic profession is nowhere near as dangerous as the medical profession (Daniel T. Barrett, DC, 8/25/99)
- Removing pressure on spinal nerves has to do more good than leaving it there. (Barry Shapiro, DC, 9/11/99)
- Thanks for helping chiropractic to grow. (Raymond Wright, DC, 10/31/99)
- Chiropractors should remove nerve interference. That is all! (Brian Covey, DC, 11/15/99)
- Yellow journalism (Stephen M. Shaw, DC, 4/14/00)
- Sour grapes? (Nicole Hughes, DC, 4/20/00)
- You should revise your mission statement! (Todd Small, DC, 5/11,00)
- Chiropractic works! (Jeremy Davidson, 7/1/00)
- Why I believe in chiropractic (Vicki Horn, C.A., 7/15/00)
- Quackopractor (James Womelduff, 7/25/00)
- Your Web site makes me steam (Bobby Lane, 9/13/00)
- You should start a MedBase (Mark A. Parsons, DC, 9/28/00)
- This site doesn't tell the whole story (Jim Bortolotto, DC, 10/22/00)
- The objective straight chiropractic viewpoint (11/5/2000)
- You are very stupid (Joye King, DC, 11/12/00)
- Our purpose is to remove nerve interference. (Mariclaire Russo, DC, 11/26/00)
- Barrett's the quack! (Adam Tanase, 3/28/01)
- Chiropractors are not unsufficiently trained! (Anthony Breitbach, 5/7/01)
- I know what you do with your quackery website (Jack A. Atzmon, DC, 8/14/01)
- The basic principles of chiropractic cannot be debated. (Kevin M. Phillips, DC, 5/1/02)
- In response to your ignorance (name removed by request, 3/2/99, 2/3/04, 2/4/04)
- Every single patient I have seen has benefited (Michael Bartell, DC, 3/8/04)
- I have never met a chiropractor who speaks or writes in the manner you have posted (Michelle Frankin, DC, 4/19/04 and 4/20/04)
- Most of your information is a bunch of garbage. (Matthew James Charles, 9/19/04 and 9/30/04)
- Your site makes me laugh. (Shandria A. Kelly, 11/14/04)
- Do you sleep well at night knowing that you are a slave to the drug companies? (Jonathan Kropf, 12/6/04)
- Stroke doesn't exist because of chiropractors (Daniel Crocker, 3/28/06)
- You should try to structure your Web site on facts not feelings (Moses Bernard, 4/6/07)
For Additional Information
This page was revised on September 3, 2007.